RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Latest version: v1.3 (2023)

Post Reply
James858988
2-4 posts
2-4 posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Sunday 18 Feb 2024, 13:19
Name: James

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by James858988 »

https://ibb.co/BFq6zDM
https://ibb.co/XZHd2hxb

you can check the pic right here, first one is with the scenery and the second one is remove the nrt.
User avatar
Martin_Starski
200+ posts
200+ posts
Posts: 3948
Joined: Monday 24 Sep 2012, 11:11
Name: Marcin
Location: Warszawa

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Martin_Starski »

We checked it and we have not observed any issues. just some new default buildings around the airport.

Image

Image
brianprice49
2-4 posts
2-4 posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Saturday 20 Jan 2024, 14:33
Name: Mandretti
Location: Oregon

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by brianprice49 »

Not sure how this thread works. Looks like a continuous stream of every kind of problem and not separate threads for each problem. If I've got that wrong let me know.

Just installed this airport and having the flickering/flashing problem with glass as others have mentioned. This is the only airport that does this. Have tried TAA-DLSS, full screen to Windowed etc etc. Looks like this has been going on for some time so I'm assuming there's some solution for this. Thanks.
brianprice49
2-4 posts
2-4 posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Saturday 20 Jan 2024, 14:33
Name: Mandretti
Location: Oregon

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by brianprice49 »

This happens in External, Drone and Pilot/cockpit views.
User avatar
Martin_Starski
200+ posts
200+ posts
Posts: 3948
Joined: Monday 24 Sep 2012, 11:11
Name: Marcin
Location: Warszawa

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Martin_Starski »

brianprice49 wrote: Friday 17 Oct 2025, 17:56 Not sure how this thread works.
Exactly as you described.
brianprice49 wrote: Friday 17 Oct 2025, 17:56 the flickering/flashing problem with glass
We have this issue on our to-do list as this airport requires some updates, especially for MSFS 2024. This is something that we will try to work on, but ETA is not known yet.
lyy13904
2-4 posts
2-4 posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Friday 24 Oct 2025, 01:15
Name: BBQ

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by lyy13904 »

Hi, just purchased RJAA for MSFS 2024. However, I found that the ILS doesn't align with the runway but to the right. Any idea why and how to fix? Aircraft used is PMDG 777-200ER
User avatar
Martin_Starski
200+ posts
200+ posts
Posts: 3948
Joined: Monday 24 Sep 2012, 11:11
Name: Marcin
Location: Warszawa

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Martin_Starski »

Hi. Can you elaborate? Which runway and what nav data have been used by you? Can you show it via screenshot? It might help us to replicate your issue.

So far I don't remember any similar reports. Generally we use the nav data of MSFS. Are you sure that you don't have any other Narita scenery or some old files?
lyy13904
2-4 posts
2-4 posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Friday 24 Oct 2025, 01:15
Name: BBQ

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by lyy13904 »

Martin_Starski wrote: Tuesday 28 Oct 2025, 19:38 Hi. Can you elaborate? Which runway and what nav data have been used by you? Can you show it via screenshot? It might help us to replicate your issue.

So far I don't remember any similar reports. Generally we use the nav data of MSFS. Are you sure that you don't have any other Narita scenery or some old files?
Hi apologies I did not see your response. Here is the screenshot until now. You can see it's off to the right for ILS16R. I'm using PMDG 777-200ER with Navigraph nav data. I don't have any other Narita scenery besides this one.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Martin_Starski
200+ posts
200+ posts
Posts: 3948
Joined: Monday 24 Sep 2012, 11:11
Name: Marcin
Location: Warszawa

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Martin_Starski »

lyy13904 wrote: Saturday 29 Nov 2025, 17:57 You can see it's off to the right for ILS16R.
Have you already checked if there is no such an issue with a default scenery?
Overlord
5-12 posts
5-12 posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Tuesday 24 Sep 2024, 14:44
Name: Overlord

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Overlord »

I can confirm that Ils approaches are not correct (probably after last WU Japan update). ILS 34L approach is also offset by few metres. Tested in PMDG 777, default navdata (no navigraph). MSFS2020.
User avatar
Martin_Starski
200+ posts
200+ posts
Posts: 3948
Joined: Monday 24 Sep 2012, 11:11
Name: Marcin
Location: Warszawa

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Martin_Starski »

So, it's the same with a default scenery, right?
Overlord
5-12 posts
5-12 posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Tuesday 24 Sep 2024, 14:44
Name: Overlord

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Overlord »

Martin_Starski wrote: Thursday 11 Dec 2025, 09:26 So, it's the same with a default scenery, right?
I dont know. I dont want to use default airport when I have payware one. It is question for developer. Some payware airports use default navdata and just retexture the runway. They dont touch the ils or glideslope or papis. Some payware airports change and relocate the runway(s) add the realistic slopes and align the glideslope and ils to the new runway position. I think this airport could use default navdata for the runway(s) positions from the old bing satelite imagery. After MSFS 2020 got the same world as 2024 has (SU 16) it probably shifted runways little bit to the left making aircraft centered with ils right next to runway (in case of runways 34L and 34R). I guess aircraft will be aligned to the left of the runway with the 16R and 16L.
User avatar
Martin_Starski
200+ posts
200+ posts
Posts: 3948
Joined: Monday 24 Sep 2012, 11:11
Name: Marcin
Location: Warszawa

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Martin_Starski »

As far as I remember, we use a default MSFS navdata there - that's why I was asking whether you observe the same issue with a default scenery.
Overlord
5-12 posts
5-12 posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Tuesday 24 Sep 2024, 14:44
Name: Overlord

Re: RJAA Tokyo Narita MSFS

Post by Overlord »

20251219012034_1.jpg
20251219012109_1.jpg
As you can see this is 34L - dont mind the incomplete and ugly scenery. My CPU was running at 100% because BATC got completely out of control and my CPU did not have even time to load the scenery properly.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply